I was reading Nancy Flanagan’s blog, Teacher in a Strange Land, for theTeacher Leaders Network. Apparently, her hometown paper reprinted a recent article she wrote for her blog some time ago. The letters mailed in reaction to her opinions about competition in education were interestingly explosive and quite “anti-Nancy.” I commented on her article as follows:
This article is dead on. I also think that some of this attitude is well intentioned but very outdated. I say this because I recognize it in some of those I love. It kinda relates to the debate about monetization. “Why do you post your curriculum on your website?” asks my father. He spends time over Friday dinner fretting that I’m not competitive enough as if, because I collaborate or teach teachers, I am, somehow, not business savvy enough…
But times they are a’changin’. We live in a collaborative world of Open Source and Web 2.0. It’s not that competition isn’t valuable. It’s just not the driving force in our craft, and that includes how we run our profession and our schools.
I believe in differentiation all around. Some institutions do need competition, perhaps even some schools do. But to make a sweeping rule pitting one group’s limited resources against another’s plentiful ones, is not the way to solve education’s problems. Perhaps some students do reflect their parent’s mentality and do need competition in order to thrive. But these students cannot drive an entire society of educational philosophy.
Much of the time, I welcome input from those outside our profession on what they feel is dysfunctional about education. See my blog article, Education X Prize
, as proof. But the topic of more competition between schools and in the classroom is not one of those topics.
For whatever reason, many people bring their own background to the table; they bring their own sagas to their argument. Perhaps they remember struggling to compete for a goal when the odds were not in their favor. Perhaps they remember competing against those with more resources then they had as they struggled up their prospective ladders. Perhaps they remember working to better their lives against those who set obstacles in their way. Perhaps they feel that these life lessons of competition made them who they are today, gave them strength, character, and stamina.
Wait, I see a pattern.
What is it that I just described from those days of ‘yore that schools and students aren’t already going through already? Schools already compete for grants because we are under funded. Students already compete for teacher attention in the light of overcrowded rooms. Both schools and students already compete against the economic cards stacked against them, like leaves on the jungle floor struggling to share the sunlight.
Those that support competition in the schools are well intentioned, but what life lessons do they want from us all to learn that we don’t already live with day after day?
Schools already compete for the simple resources we need to help students compete outside of education. Teachers compete for program funding, sometimes against teachers at their own site. Students compete against each other through academic, social, and athletic programs. School is, by no means, a competition-free oasis. What more do these people want?